Primary Sources:
1) Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986. Print.
Secondary Sources:
Books:
1) Cohen, Marshall. Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. London: Duckworth, 1984. Print.
2) Ripstein, Arthur. Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print.
3) Burley, Justine. Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies from Dworkin. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. Print.
Journal Articles:
1) Ekins, Richard. "Legislative Intent in Law's Empire." Ratio Juris 24.4 (2011): 435-460. Web.
2) Tutt, Andrew. "The Improbability of Positivism." Pace Law Review 34.2 (2014): 562-585. Web.
3) Goorden, Dean. "Dworkin and Phenomenology of the "Pre-Legal." Ratio Juris 25.3 (2012): 393-408. Web.
4) Leiter, Brain. "Explaining Theoretical Disagreement." University of Chicago Law Review 76.3 (2009): 1215-1250. Web.
5) Martinich, A. P. "Ideal Interpretation: The Theories of Zhu Xi and Ronald Dworkin." Philosophy East and West 60.1 (2010): 88-114. Web.
6) Dare, Tim. "Disagreeing about Disagreement in Law: The Argument from Theoretical Disagreement." Philosophical Topics 38.2 (2010): 1-15. Web.
7) Raz, Joseph. "Dworkin, a New Link in the Chain." California Law Review 74.3 (1986): 1103. Web.
8) Smith, Dale. "Theoretical Disagreement and the Semantic Sting." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30.1 (2010): 635. Web.
9) Leiter, Brian. "Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence." American Journal of Jurisprudence 48.1 (2003): 17-51. Web.
10) Finnis, John. "On Reason and Authority in Law's Empire." Law and Philosophy 6.1 (1987): 357-380. Web.
11) Mckie, J. L. "The Third Theory of Law." Philosophy and Public Affairs 7.1 (1977): 3-16. Web.
12) Alexander, Larry. "Striking Back at the Empire: A Brief Survey of Problems in Dworkin's Theory of Law." Law and Philosophy 6.3 (1987): 419-438. Web.
13) Lee, Win-Chiat. "Statutory Interpretation and the Counterfactual Test for Legislative Intention." Law and Philosophy 8.3 (1989): 383-404. Web.
14) Endicott, Timothy. "Are There Any Rules." The Journal of Ethics 5.3 (2001): 199-220. Web.
15) Ross, Stephen. "Law, Integrity, and Interpretation: Ronald Dworkin's Law's Empire." Metaphilosophy 22.3 (1991): 265-279. Web.
16) Silver, Charles. "Elmer's Case: A Legal Positivist Replies to Dworkin." Law and Philosophy 6.3 (1987): 381-399. Web.
17) Hoy, David C. "Dworkin's Constructive Optimism V. Deconstructive Legal Nihilism." Law and Philosophy 6.3 (1987): 321-356. Web.
18) Mahoney, Jon. "Objectivity, Interpretation, and Rights: A Critique of Dworkin." Law and Philosophy 23.2 (2004): 187-222. Web.
